The BPM is collaborating with the EDI Department!

The BPM is incredibly excited to announce that we have been working in collaboration with the University of Zürich’s Equality, Diversity, and Inclusion Department to write, direct, and perform a theatrical workshop titled UNIVERSITY SIMULATOR!

Performances will take place on Friday the 5th of December at 18:30 in the ETH main building, room HG E 41; and Saturday the 6th of December at 18:30 in the UZH main building, room RAA-G-01.

Entry is free but a reservation is required as there are limited seats. You can reserve tickets here.

Summary:
Eddy, a naïve but well-meaning Video Game Streamer, is excited to test out a new game called University Simulator in which the objective is to make it through a semester of University with the highest possible amount of Credits. A lot is riding on him getting a perfect score; after all, if he manages to do so, he will donate all the proceeds from his stream to ‘women or something like that’. When he boots up the Character Selection screen, he is faced with four possible options, most of them equipped with some form of social disadvantage. Should he play as Erin, the lesbian? Or Tonya, the woman of colour? Should he try his hand at Carrie, who has ADHD? Or should he stick with the ‘safe’ option of Guy, the white man?

As Eddy makes his way through the various levels of the game, it quickly becomes apparent that getting the highest amount of Credits isn’t as easy as he thought it would be. In fact, the whole structure of the game appears to be rigged against the characters depending on what demographics they inhabit.

In collaboration with the EDI Department, the Blueprint Masquerades have created an interactive theatrical workshop that is meant to engage viewers and get them to reflect on how certain marginalised groups are at a systemic disadvantage in institutions such as Universities. Throughout the play, the audience (or ‘chat’, as Eddy calls them) will be faced with certain choices, ranging from which character to pick to what social group the players should join. Based on these choices, different paths are unlocked that add or remove Credits and contribute to the final score. Will Eddy achieve his goal of a perfect score? Or will he fail to get the Credits needed to graduate the semester? And, most importantly, what will he learn about himself and the world around him?

Sign-ups are OPEN!

Until the 28th of September, you can sign up to join our upcoming 2025/26 production as cast or crew.

👉 Sign up for Cast
👉 Sign up for Crew

Note: As some of our audition dates fall on Yom Kippur and Dusserah, we are happy to make accommodations for anyone unable to make the 1st or 2nd due to religious reasons. Just put a comment in your sign-up form and you’ll be able to do all your auditions on the 3rd

We’re currently in the planning phase of the production, and this is your chance to be part of it from the very beginning. You can find more information here.

Want to stay updated? You can also sign up for our newsletter or follow us on Instagram for announcements.

Q&A with the Directors

Behind the scenes of our performance prep, we had a chat with our directors, Emily and Georgie, and asked them a few questions about their co-authored play “Broken Strings” and the process of putting it on stage.

E: It all started about two years ago—I remember us sitting in Gerold’s Garten. I asked, “Hey, do you want to write a play together, pitch it to the BPM, and direct it?” Georgie said yes!
G: We’d known each other for a few years already and had ideas for collaborative projects, though nothing serious. Writing a play was always something we wanted to do. Specifically, we wanted to pitch something tailored to the BPM, that kind of represents the diversity within the BPM itself. We thought Broken Strings would be a perfect fit—and now, here we are!

Q: What was the initial spark that started the play? Did you take inspiration from any other pieces of media?

E: The basic idea came from imagining a story about a band, entirely set on their tour bus. Initially, it was just a spin-off from another passion project we were working on. Eventually, we realized it could work really well on stage since it’s set in a single location. From there, we sat down, figured out our characters and the central conflict, and that grew into Broken Strings.
G: A great part of working together is sharing inspirations. Real-life band drama definitely influenced us, as did fictional stories like I Was Born for This by Alice Oseman, Scott Pilgrim, and Daisy Jones & The Six. It’s nice to blend different ideas.
E: Funny enough, I was also inspired by a Tumblr post complaining about celebrities flying in private jets instead of taking tour buses—where the real drama happens.

Q: Did either of you have personal experiences or any real-life conflicts that helped shape the script?

G: Definitely. Personal experiences inevitably shape our writing and the characters we create. We aimed to represent our perspectives without directly recreating specific events from our lives. Sometimes we took a small personal experience and gave it to a character who might handle it differently.
E: As a concrete example, we’re both aromantic and asexual, so we put some of our experiences into Billie, our aro-ace character. But Billie’s story is still very distinct from ours.

Q: Given that fact, was it difficult to write romance in the play?

G: Yes and no. I actually enjoy writing romantic subplots—living vicariously through the characters. But there were definitely moments we struggled with—asking ourselves, “Would they kiss here? What would they even say?”
E: For me, directing romantic scenes was challenging. We always bring in an intimacy coordinator, but this time it was essential to make scenes feel organic. Initially, we just awkwardly directed actors with placeholders like, “You kiss now?”
G: Directing romance turned into a bit of an inside joke. We’d say, “Can you two do something more… couply?” and the actors would laugh. Thankfully, they’re great at bringing their own ideas to the scenes.

Q: As co-directors, how do you decide when to push the actors toward a specific style of line delivery versus letting them chart their own path?

E: Generally, during rehearsals, we initially let actors perform scenes without much direction, then gradually shape it together. The first attempts often look chaotic, but as we guide them, actors naturally develop interesting details, especially in background interactions. We typically set the broader vision or specific line deliveries, but actors have room to add their own touches.
G: Since it’s our own play, we can easily adapt the script. Actors sometimes suggest changing or adding lines, and we’re always open to discussion. That flexibility helps lines feel authentic.
E: But occasionally, we do need to firmly direct actors or reject suggestions if they don’t make sense or don’t fit the vision.

Q: Have there been any unexpected, especially dramatic or funny backstage moments that could rival the onstage antics?

E: Definitely! Today, for example, we did a “director’s version” of Broken Strings—
G: Just the four of us performed the entire first scene, playing all 13 characters. It was absolute chaos. The Actors jokingly shouted instructions like “volume” and “articulation” at us, realizing it’s not personal when we do it—just necessary feedback. Plus, it was fun.
E: We also enjoy doing improv and “cut scenes” with the actors, creating prompts for scenes happening between or after main events. It helps the actors develop their characters more deeply, which enriches their performances.

Q: Did it change any part of the production itself?

E: Yes—sometimes improv ideas become permanent. For instance, Ophelia officially writing fan fiction started as an improv joke, and now she mentions it on stage.
G: As an ad-lib!

Q: Which actor in the cast is most like their character in real life? Was that something you noted while casting, or happenstance?

E: Definitely Larissa, who plays Buddy. She’s genuinely sweet and wholesome and even loves baking—especially gluten-free, just like her character. We didn’t intentionally typecast her; we weren’t even sure she’d audition, but it naturally worked out.
G: Exactly. We didn’t write the role specifically for her. Casting was completely open, but her similarities to Buddy made her a great fit.

Q: Were there characters that were easier/harder to write & direct?

G: Hollie and Buddy were easy to write. They’re straightforward characters—they love baking and each other. Their drama is simple and easily resolved, making them joyful to write.
Tamar was more challenging. He’s close to my heart, the type who pretends everything’s fine when it’s not. Initially, we worried he might seem passive-aggressive or unlikable, but we learned it’s all in the actor’s delivery. We focused on casting someone who could portray Tamar’s inner conflict sympathetically.
E: When we first read Tamar’s scenes aloud, we realized he could be likeable if portrayed as genuine rather than passive.

Q: What’s your favorite line in the play?

E: Mac’s line in Act 2, Scene 3: “Every time I saw them, they just moshed away.”
G: Mine is Van’s line: “I know you don’t have social media, but BeReal with me.”

Q: What aspect of the production design was the most fun to put together?

G: We didn’t directly design most elements—it was a big collaborative effort. Personally, I’m excited about the costumes. Even though we didn’t have much direct input, seeing the little details come together was amazing.
E: I’m most excited about the music—especially hearing it performed live. We wrote the play’s music style specifically for our head of music, who specializes in rock and metal.
The tracks we’ve heard so far sound fantastic, and seeing the band play live is something I really love.

Q: Do you have musical backgrounds of some kind yourselves? How does that influence the way you bring the band’s story to life?

G: I’m a classically trained flutist, so I’ve played classical music in orchestras and ensembles. This play’s music is outside my comfort zone, but I found exploring new styles very enjoyable. We included a flute in the band as a fun nod, though honestly, I’m still unsure about the exact music genre the band has!
E: I played piano for a long time, and my dad is a professional classical musician and composer, but again, classical music differs greatly from this project. My love of rock music for sure influenced the play, so it features songs we’d genuinely enjoy.
G: Honestly, working on this has made me want to be in a band myself—even if the play doesn’t always depict band life positively!

Q: If you could join a touring band yourselves, which role would you most like to take on?

E & G (in unison): We’d love to play drums!
E: Drums just seem fun—you get to hit things and look cool.
G: Exactly! Plus, female drummers have a fantastic vibe. Although bass guitar also seems great—even if it unfairly has the reputation of being for people who can’t play anything else.
E: Shredding a guitar could be amazing, too.
G: Maybe we just want to do everything.

Q: If you were to go on an extended road trip, what character(s) from Broken Strings would you most like to bring along?

E: Definitely Hollie and Buddy, so they could bake delicious gluten-free cookies—I have celiac disease. Also, Van, because they are a reliable driver.
G: Van would also be a fantastic friend on the road.
E: Within the band, I feel I’d vibe best with Izzy. He’s chill and genuinely loves his friends.
G: Izzy’s definitely fun. So, our ideal group is Hollie, Buddy, Van, and Izzy.

Q: Were there scenes you imagined differently, or moments when you disagreed? How did you resolve it?

G: Not often! Usually, we agree. It’s funny when Emily gives a note, and I realize I wrote the exact same thing down. We’re pretty in sync. There was one minor disagreement we couldn’t resolve easily, so we played rock-paper-scissors—I won, so we did it my way.
E: I’m still upset! Just kidding, I don’t even remember what it was.
G: Ironically, we ended up partly using your idea in the end. I think the delivery turned out to be a good balance of both approaches. Still, I did win.
E: I guess Georgie’s officially the ultimate director, having won the boss battle.
G: The Alpha director!
E (laughing): Please don’t put that in.
Interviewer: Oh, I’m definitely leaving it in.

Q&A with the Directors

In preparation for our performances in less than a month (!), we had a chat with our directors, Mary and Robin, and asked them a few questions about the play and the process of putting on “Pirate Appreciation Day” by Matthew Warner.

M: It’s fun and it’s a lot easier because we work well together.
R: I couldn’t imagine doing this job without co-directing. It’s so much work, so it’s nice to have someone next to you to support you and bounce ideas off of. And someone to weigh in on decisions.
M: It also makes it easier when there is someone else to also give feedback so that not everything rests on your shoulders. The work can be split up, which makes it easier especially in a group as big as we are. By splitting the work communicating with the other departments is easier. And it’s more fun in general to come up with ideas together.

Q: What has been the most exciting part so far? And have you had any obstacles to overcome?

R: I think the most exciting thing is seeing everything come together because we have been planning this whole thing since last summer. I remember reading the script together for the first time and going through it, wondering how we were going to do this. Designing sketches for the stage. And now we have the stage, we have the actors, and we have the lines and we’re combining it with music. It’s exciting seeing it all come together.
M: A lot of things were happening in our heads, but seeing everything come together on the stage is so much fun. And seeing how much fun the other people in the group are having with the ideas we come up with together is very exciting. Especially seeing all the fighting, dancing, choreography, and stage movement. 
R: It’s not always easy though. There is a lot of scheduling, preplanning, and organizing involved. There is overall an enormous amount of work going into it behind the scenes and we have to thank our assistants and the heads of the other departments for that work as well.
M: Yeah, communication is easier than expected but still difficult sometimes. It can be hard to reschedule sometimes if people forget to communicate, but the end product makes it worth it.
R: Exactly. The passion and the motivation shown by everyone make it all worth it.

Q: Would you say organizing and directing is also hard(er) because there are so many people in the cast?

M: Since we have both a speaking and a non-speaking cast, balancing those two out is very hard, and we don’t want anyone not to feel appreciated (pun intended). But we’re doing our best to make sure everyone feels as included as possible.

Q: What pieces of media have inspired you for both the stage and the play in general?

M: I mean the biggest inspiration is Pirates of the Caribbean. It’s the pirate media we know the best.
R: For the comedy aspect and putting our twist on the play, we were inspired by Monty Python, Allo Allo!, and Aunty Donna.
M: They have that Slapstick/Sketch comedy that we want to bring on stage, that is very entertaining to us.
R: There are also movie hints hidden here and there throughout the play, which you will have to watch out for when coming to see the play. For the stage itself, we’re going for a childhood bedroom theme. Because the play is so whimsical and silly, we wanted to embrace that with the stage design and make it feel like the characters themselves are toys in a kid’s bedroom. 

Q: How is this play different/the same as previous productions?

R: First of all, it’s massive. I remember the BPM when we were max. 25 people, now we are 50 people in the whole production. It’s the largest cast we’ve ever had on stage, the most elaborate set changes, the most props, and the most music written for a play. We wanted to go big for all departments and this absolutely would not be possible without everyone there.
M: Yes, there are so many people here for a reason. Every person is needed and is helping so much with putting this play on the stage. It is amazing to see.

Q: What can the audience expect from this play? Is there a moment you are most excited for the audience to see?

R: It’s a silly play, so come for the entertainment, come for lots of laughs and a fun evening. What we are excited for the audience to see are the more alien parts, the special effects, and seeing all the elements coming together.
M: Come for a lot of silly goofs and silly jokes. We’re also slightly nervous to see how the audience will respond to the play and the jokes because a lot of funny bits have come out of the rehearsal process. Actors are giving the characters their own spin and it’s hilarious. There is always something new and something to make us laugh in every scene.
R: Beware, you’re going to have a fun time!

Q: What’s your favorite line in the play?

R: I mean, there are so many, but here are a few of them:
‘I’m just a dainty little bitch selling girl scout cookies’
‘Whoops. Gotta go!’
‘But Dad, I’m the only one on this ship who speaks ancient Lovecraftian. I have to help!’
‘You see, according to the Definitive History of American —’
‘I was wondering if tonight you would like to dine at the captain’s table.’ … ‘Uh, would you please M.C. this contest if you’re able?’
M: In short, the whole play.

Q: What’s your favorite prop piece?

M: The trident.
R: Frederick’s suitcase and what’s inside it.

Q: If you were stranded on a deserted island, which character would you like to have with you?

R + M: Bridget. She has everything a man needs, everything a woman needs, too, anything any person could ever need. She could probably pull an entire ship out of her pocket.

And finally, we also had a conversation with our head of music, Cédi, to talk about the inspiration behind this year’s music.

Q: How did you use music to convey specific moods? And what kind of music inspired you?

C: We use different instrumentations within our pieces or put emphasis on specific instruments to convey a specific mood. We’re also using tools like rhythm, pace, and tonalities to convey certain moods. We’re playing a lot with conventions, either subverting them or playing into them which can create the desired effects we want.
Because the play is set on a cruise ship in the Caribbean or just the Atlantic Ocean in general, we have looked at a lot of Latin music – from Cuba, from Brazil, just in general from South America – and we have got a lot of inspiration from there. We’ve played with all different types of conventions, so the music is all over the place when it comes to genres. In that sense, we’ve drawn inspiration from all sorts of places in the area where the play is set, giving them justice but also giving them our own twists and sometimes subverting the conventions of their music to fit the play.

We are part of “Support Culture” again!

Once again, the Blueprint Masquerades is part of Migros’ “Support Culture” campaign! Whenever you buy something at Migros for over 20 CHF, collect Vereinsbons and scan the QR code to allocate them to us! The more Bons we get, the more money Migros will give us from their pot to support our production. It’s free for you, with a great benefit to us! 🎭🧡 You can collect and scan the Bons until 15 April.

You can find our Migros Support Culture page here!! Feel free to share this with your family, friends, neighbours, and so on…

2024 Production Announcement

We are proud to announce our new play for this upcoming year: Pirate Appreciation Day by Matthew Warner! It is a comedy with pirates, holiday vibes, and maybe potentially a scary sea monster. If that sounds exciting to you, hop over to our current production page, where you can find a plot summary as well as information about the performances!!

Now let us introduce ourselves:

Cast

Bridget – Naomi Schenkel
Captain – Eliza Eckhart
Halitosis Halvard – Linus Zwahlen
Walker D. Plank – Yossif Marinov
Frederick Fillingsworth – Aysegül Barlas
Doris Nettleton – Wilmari Claasen
Ned Nettleton – Gustav Reutter
Paisley Nettleton – Max Ungert
Gina – Alexandra Maximsdottir
BJ the DJ – Gian-Luca Kuoni
Supporting Cast – Danielle Claasen
Jana Eberle
Jenny Eiholzer
Alex Schulz
Mickey Shavit-Zepeda
Noemi Shavit-Zepeda
Magnus Vargas

Crew

Co-Directors – Robin Künzler
Maruja Ortega
Assistant Directors – Viviane Oswald
Emily Rushton
Co-Producers – Wilmari Claasen
Eliza Eckhart
Assistant Producers – Zsombor Jeney
Treasurer – Ladina Mauchle

Co-Heads of Stage – Lara Giannini
Holly Werner
Stage Crew – Larissa Bison
Georgina Ford
Vivien Frischknecht
Mustafa Khan
Alex Schulz
Noemi Shavit-Zepeda
Anne Treinen

Head of Marketing – Jenny Gasser
Photography – Noah Lang
Videography – Emily Rushton
Social Media – Suli Yang
Graphic Design – Sofia Bazinaka
Isabel Schmidt
Website – Sinja Bucher

Co-Heads of Costumes – Antony Brogli
Jana Eberle
Costume Crew – Anatha
Sofia Bazinaka
Sinja Bucher
Jenny Eiholzer
Al Liechti
Yashna Rathod
Lux Züst

Head of Props – Lilith Frey
Props Crew – Danielle Claasen
Zsombor Jeney
Mustafa Khan
Gian-Luca Kuoni
Suli Yang

Co-Heads of Music – Cédric Stüssi
Nico Wolf
Music Crew – Larissa Bison (Piano)
Archer Heimann (Percussion)
Rahel Koller (Violin)
Leon Schultz (Bass)
Anne Treinen (Flute & Piccolo)
Nico Wolf (Guitar)

We can’t wait to see you at the performances next spring!!

We are part of “Support Culture”

The Blueprint Masquerades is part of the “Support Culture” campaign from Migros! Whenever you buy something at Migros that’s over 20 CHF, collect Vereinsbons and scan the QR code to allocate them to us! The more Bons we get, the more money Migros will give us from their pot to support our production. It’s free for you, with a great benefit to us! 🎭🧡 You can collect and scan the Bons until 17 April.

You can find our Migros Support Culture page here!! Feel free to share this with your family, friends, neighbours, and so on…

2023 Production Announcement!!

The BPM is proud to announce the 2023 play: The Plot, like Gravy, Thickens by Billy St. John! The play’s subtitle promises it to be “A Murder Mystery/ Comedy with Audience Interaction, Great Storm Effects, Spiffy Costumes, and Lots of Other Good Stuff”. If that sounds exciting to you, hop over to our current production page, where you can find a plot summary as well as information about the performances!!

Now let us introduce ourselves:

Cast

Walter 1 / Edward Worthington – William Jones
Walter 2 / James McMillan – Guido Marinoni
Allegra – Ayşegül Barlas
Tony Blackwell – Aviv Shavit-Zepeda
Justine Worthington – Naomi Schenkel
Peggy Sue Brumley – Jay Dürig
Beatrice Worthington – Josephine Müller
Roy Phillips – Antony Brogli
Connie Phillips – Wilmari Claasen
Lawrence Tate – Alain Liechti
Debra Worthington – Jana Eberle
Edith – Selina Forrer
Hollister – Gian-Luca Kuoni
Mrs. Vickers – Janine Ochsenbein
Ina – Victoria Buchholz

Crew

Co-Directors – Eliza Eckhart
Alex Schulz
Assistant Directors – Robin Künzler
Maruja Ortega
Producer – Jay Dürig
Assistant Producers – Lara Giannini
Ren Schnüriger
Treasurer – Ladina Mauchle

Head of Stage – Noah Lang
Stage Crew – Lara Giannini
Chiara Longhi
Noemi Shavit-Zepeda
Aviv Shavit-Zepeda
Lighting Technician – Holly Werner

Co-Heads of Marketing – Sinja Bucher
Jenny Gasser
Photography – Letícia Peredo
Noemi Shavit-Zepeda
Videography – Emily Rushton
Social Media – Pascale Albrecht
Keyshav Mor
Anne Treinen
Graphic Design – Isabel Schmidt
Merch Design – Linda Lucius
Isabel Schmidt
Website – Lara Giannini

Head of Costumes – Wilmari Claasen
Costume Crew – Zoe Bischoff
Jana Eberle
Jenny Eiholzer
Max Korobeynikova
Gian-Luca Kuoni
Veronika Neumann
Noemi Shavit-Zepeda
Holly Werner

Head of Props – Lilith Frey
Props Crew – Varvara Lantukh
Linda Lucius
Holly Werner

Head of Music – Cédric Stüssi
Assistant Head of Music – Nico Wolf
Music Crew – Larissa Bison (Piano)
Kathrin Sauder (Violin)
Anne Treinen (Flute / Piccolo)
Nico Wolf (Guitar)
Linus Zwahlen (Saxophone)

We can’t wait to see you in spring!!

Q&A With the Directors

Last spring, Carmen and Isabel, our two co-writers and co-directors of The Forest attended a colloquium on the topic “Performing Shakespeare” together at the English Seminar. As this topic fit the BPM’s 2021 production and what Isabel and Carmen did with their adaption of Macbeth perfectly, one of their classmates, Philipp Makowski, conducted a little interview with them. They provide fascinating background info on what it means to adapt a play and how they did it! Read on if you want to know more:

«During the last session of our colloquium “Performing Shakespeare” taught by Dr Beatrice Montedoro, we invited two members of the Blueprint Masquerades (BPM), Carmen Aeschbacher and Isabel Schmidt, to talk about their current production, The Forest, which they co-wrote and are now co-directing. Furthermore, two students in the colloquium and also members of the BPM, Ladina Mauchle and Gian-Luca Kuoni, also were so kind to provide us with insights on the on-going production as actors and participants in the departments of costume and stage, respectively. The Forest is a modern adaptation of William Shakespeare’s Macbeth, which we discussed in the early part of our colloquium before moving on to the playtexts and theatre productions of The Tempest and A Midsummer Night’s Dream. We focused on how these plays can be read, staged and interpreted while they are translated from text on the page to image and performance on the stage, in theatre productions or even films. This helped us understand, see and interpret the plays in different and new ways. Therefore, we were particularly keen on reading a student adaptation of a play we discussed in class, which led us to this Q&A that Carmen and Isabel kindly provided us with. We started with general questions about being a director at BPM, then moved on to questions about the process of re-writing Macbeth and, finally, asked questions about the process of staging The Forest.

Q: How does one become a director of the student group BPM?
C: Since it is a student organisation, it happens with no specific process. However, we usually vote for directors at the GV, with a focus on members with experience in the BPM. It is, though, open to anyone who is interested!

Q: What does it mean to be a director?
C: The simple answer is, everything. Together with the producer it is the responsibility to put the play onto a stage. The fact that we co-directed this year made it easier, because there is a person to remind you of things you might forget.
I: A large part of it is focused on organising all departments and telling actors what to do.
C: Fortunately, we have very talented actors, who also come up with their own suggestions!

Q: To what degree is this a collaborative process, and how much do you stick to your own vision?
I: It is very collaborative. We had some visions for characters and such, but the departments also came up with their own ideas. As directors we then thought about combining these ideas and making sure that they would work together in a cohesive way.
C: We meet up regularly, before the rehearsals, with the respective head of each department to brainstorm together. Even when ideas are not compatible, we are, fortunately, able to talk it out and find a common ground.

Q: How did you pick Macbeth as the starting point of your creative process?
C: We [Isabel and I] spent a lot of time in February 2020 talking about Shakespeare in general. Also, Isabel was thinking about her potential bachelor thesis, in relation to ecocriticism and Shakespeare. Through this we found out that we had similar ideas about what we could do with Macbeth.
I: We thought it would be fun to write an adaptation of a Shakespeare play! We also thought that it would be interesting to rewrite a tragedy rather than a comedy and that there would be a lot we could do with Macbeth.

Q: How was the process of re-writing Macbeth?
C: A lot of time was spent on brainstorming and the concept and particularly thinking about what characters and storylines to keep, what happens when and what plot twists we would keep. The writing process then happened over the course of Summer 2020, so we could give the others in Blueprint Masquerades a preview to read before the voting.
I: Yes, it probably took around half a year, but it was great fun.

Q: How did you treat the original Shakespearian text in your adaptation?
C: We really went through the lines and discussed whether they would stay or go. We had our respective favourite scenes, where we wanted to remain as close to the source text as possible. The challenge then was to modernise the text to adapt it to our new setting.
I: The goals were to have fun with it and make it [the play] seem natural despite keeping a lot of the original text. Some scenes are, therefore, quite close to Macbeth, while others were completely cut, or new characters were even added. We mostly wanted it to make sense as its own play, so people who do not know Macbeth can also enjoy it.

Q: One of the biggest changes from the original play is that you clearly portray Duncan, the owner of Duncan Chem, a company that produces chemical substances, as a villain. What inspired you to stage him this way?
I: We wanted to give Lady Macbeth more of a personality and motif for Duncan’s murder. In Macbeth she comes across as a villain and we wanted to change that. In our play, we show how Duncan has harassed Lady Macbeth, which emphasises her motivation for murdering him. Therefore, she becomes more of a morally grey person, with whom it is easier to sympathise, at least in the beginning.

Q: How did you re-interpret the three witches, the weird sisters, in The Forest?
C: They were more challenging as characters, because we wanted to give them distinctive personalities. We did not want them to explicitly be witches, particularly in the supernatural sense, but keep the mystery that surrounds them. They are probably the most revised parts of our play, because we wanted to keep the prophecy in part, but had to adapt it to our modern vision.
I: Similar to the other female characters, we wanted to give them more agency, more character and more motivations. Hecate, who only has a small part in Macbeth, receives her own distinct storyline in The Forest. That is how we treated the witches as well. We gave them a clear motivation for pushing Macbeth to kill Duncan.

Q: What was the effect of giving the characters first names, such as Celia and Aliena for the weird sisters?
C: We wanted to have the characters remain recognisable, but also make them their own, actual characters. We have fewer characters with more distinct names and storylines than Shakespeare had. With the weird sisters, we wanted their original character name to still be clearly recognisable but modernised it and normalised it by turning Weird into their surname. This was also inspired by Terry Pratchett’s The Weird Sisters.
I: The names Aliena and Celia, names of two of the weird sisters, were taken from Shakespeare’s play As You Like It. In that play, Celia disguised herself as Aliena, the same character therefore playing two. We thought it would be interesting to use these names for the Weird sisters, as they are so strongly bound together, to the point that they are almost indistinguishable.

Q: What inspired you to change Lady Macbeth’s role in the story in your re-writing?
C: I was quite unhappy with the treatment of Lady Macbeth in Macbeth, particularly towards the end when she simply disappears. We, therefore, sought to create more of a moral decay, a progression from good to bad, for her.
I: Her struggles and needs to attain her goals, while being a woman, were present in Macbeth already and we translated it to our modern interpretation, where we gave her more layers.
C: Similar to the context of the Shakespearian society, Lady Macbeth seeks to achieve her goals through her husband, and we decided to keep that as well. That is why we also paraphrased one of her monologues, to keep it in there.

Q: Why did you decide to set The Forest in modern time?
C: That was strongly motivated by the language barrier, because we wanted to make the play accessible to people outside of the English Seminar as well. So, instead of translating it, we decided to have fun with it and re-write that.

Q: What inspired the setting in the forest?
I: This setting was definitely inspired by the ecocritical aspect. In Shakespeare’s plays the forest seems to function as a transitional, magical space, where people go and disguise themselves. Particularly in comedies, characters experience this surreal, magical experience in the forest, which also changes them. We also wanted to keep that theme of the forest turning against the Macbeths, which is part of the witches’ prophecy.
C: It allowed us to focus on the psychological side of the characters, while removing them from their corporate surrounding. This allows us to play with the idea of isolating them within the forest and having them in a space with the weird sisters.
I: It really allowed us to focus on these characters and their experience without external intervention.
C: This can be compared to the setting of Lord of the Flies, where you also have this secluded, natural setting on the island, a sort of heterotopia, similar to our forest. This allows the reader, and audience, to focus on the power structures of the characters.

Q: Ladina and Gian-Luca, what were your roles in the process of staging The Forest?
L: I play Hecate, but I am also part of the costume department, and I am in charge of props too. The props, in particular, meant for me to make knives to use in the play. I got to collaborate with Carmen, specifically, to establish my character and how to play it.
G-L: At first, I was solely part of the stage crew. Halfway through the production process I stepped in to play Malcolm too. I went on a hike in nature to gather inspiration for the setting of the forest, as part of the stage crew. This helped to figure out how to develop that setting, despite limited resources. This also included the developing of how to incorporate the rocks and tent, as well as other elements of the setting.

Q: What is the function of Hecate’s prologue?
C: It functions as a welcome speech from Hecate, as a forest goddess and manager of the forest resort. This is similar to Shakespeare, who liked to incorporate prologues and epilogues by characters, who sort of explain what happened. Thereby, we wanted to set the scene with this prologue by Hecate.
I: Hecate, for me, is a character between the world of the audience and that of the play. The prologue, thus, introduces the audience into the world of the play, on a meta-level so to say.
L: I agree with this, as it provides a bridging of the business and supernatural sides of the play. Hecate is coded as supernatural in The Forest, even though this is not evoked on an explicit level but rather through use of costume and separation from the other characters.

Q: How did you use music to convey specific moods?
C: Our music composer, Andrin, wrote original music for this play. In collaboration with him, we were able to develop pieces that specifically convey the mood of a moment. I, personally, insisted on having a string player, because I think it works well in these tragic moments. The music also helps convey the supernatural elements of the play.

Q: We also noticed that the Weïrd sisters all wore a red cape: what kind of symbolism were you trying to convey with these costumes?
I: The head of costume came up with the idea that the the sisters should look like poisonous berries, since they have a poisonous influence on the other characters in the play. The colour red, thus, symbolises the allure and danger that they represent.
C: This colour scheme also enables the audience to group these characters in a distinctive way.

Q: Finally, why did you decide to have Rose Macduff and Emilia Lennox played by female actors?
C: We wanted their relationship to fuel the conflict between the Weird sisters. This produces tension later on in the play.
I: Rose Macduff is a character torn between the company, her sisters and her love interest, Emilia. As they are both in secretary roles, they are also juxtaposed with the powerful men on the level of gender. Within the play, the women then subvert these power structures.»

Thanks to Philipp for conducting this Q&A!